What important conclusion did Patterson and Steinmetz reach regarding segmental facilitation?

The important conclusion reached by Patterson and Steinmetz regarding segmental facilitation is that it may still be present after the instigating stimulus is removed. This highlights the concept that once segmental facilitation is established, it does not necessarily require ongoing stimuli to persist. This characteristic is significant in chiropractic practice because it suggests that the effects of an initial injury or irritant can lead to prolonged changes in the nervous system that continue to affect the body even after the original cause is no longer present.

This understanding informs chiropractic care and interventions, emphasizing the need for thorough assessment and treatment strategies that address not only the immediate symptoms but also the underlying patterns of facilitation that may have developed as a result of previous injuries or stressors. By recognizing that segmental facilitation can persist independently of current stimuli, practitioners can better tailor their approaches, ensuring a more comprehensive care plan for their patients.